Irish Water paid
bonuses to their employees even if they had a ’Needs Improvement’ rating on
their performance Review. You might ask what is so unusual about paying bonuses
in a company, don’t all companies do this and isn’t this the way to stimulate
performance in a company and from what we have seen of Irish Water so far their
performance definitely merits improvements.
Paying bonuses to
employees for their performance is counterproductive and doesn’t do anything to
increase the performance of employees, the opposite is true.
Repeated research by
highly regarded institutes over the last 30 years has proven without doubt that
paying bonuses for performance doesn’t work and is counterproductive. Keep in
mind the banking crisis; the collapse of a complete sector which paid itself
the highest bonuses. If bonuses worked the banking sector should be
thriving!
Any self respecting
HR practitioner knows this and would be very careful regarding implementing a
bonus culture in a new company. That is the surprising thing about Irish Water,
as it is a new company it has all the opportunities to establish a new culture
and implement policies which would help it perform, yet Irish Water immediately
returned to the failed old bonus culture. It tells me that top management is
not focussed on creating a new efficient organisation based on new proven scientific
methods but are very focussed on keeping things as they are. This is not very convincing
for the executive of a newly formed company assigned with such an important
task.
Dan Pink in his
book: ‘Drive, the Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us’ reviews the new
motivational theories developed over the last 30 years. He concludes that when
it comes to motivation there is a gap between what science knows and what
business does. Our current business operating system – which is built around
external, carrot and stick motivators (performance bonuses) doesn’t work.
Science has shown us that the new motivational approach which works has three
essential elements 1) Autonomy, the desire to direct our own lives. 2) Mastery
– the urge to get better and better at something that matters and 3) Purpose –
the yearning to do what we do in the service of something larger than
ourselves.
Up to the end of
the last century motivation and bonuses were built around external rewards (performance
bonuses) and punishments. That worked fine for routine 20th century
tasks. But in the twenty first century this old system is proving to be incompatible
with how we organise what we do, how we think about what we do, and how we do
what we do. When the carrot and stick approach used for more complicated
management roles strange things begin to happen.
Traditional ‘if-then’ rewards
can give us less than what we want. They can extinguish intrinsic motivation,
diminish performance, crush creativity and crowd out good behaviour. They can
also give us more of what we don’t want; they encourage unethical behaviour,
create addictions and foster short term thinking. And that is exactly what is
happening at Irish Water at the moment.
The Carrot and Stick
approach isn’t all bad. It can be effective for rule-based routine tasks,
because there is little intrinsic motivation to undermine and not much
creativity to crush. However, this doesn’t apply when you are setting up a new
organisation. Then creativity, ethical behaviour and performance are very much
in demand.
Modern motivational
theory centres on three important elements for employees of a company: Autonomy,
Mastery and Purpose. This is what Irish
Water should have been focussing on instead of a quick performance bonus which
is counterproductive.
If you want to see
a youtube video from Dan Pink about this have a look below.
Nice piece Kenneth. That Dan Pink book is a great read for anyone.
ReplyDelete